Another reason why .Net 3.0 should be called .Net 2.5 (or something similar)

Check out Kirk Allen Evan’s blog entry (http://blogs.msdn.com/kaevans/archive/2006/06/11/626299.aspx) . All through it, his reasons given point to calling it something less than .Net 3.0 IMHO. Again, note that .NET Framework 3.0 is an additive release to .NET Framework 2.0. With .NET Framework 3.0, the languages still use the 2.0 compilers, and leverage the 2.0.50727 Framework.It is based on 2.0 for everything so why not keep with that!!! The version number really doesn’t make anything clear!


This content originally appeared on Modern Web Development with Chrome and was authored by Paul Kinlan

<p>Check out Kirk Allen Evan's blog entry (<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/kaevans/archive/2006/06/11/626299.aspx)"><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/kaevans/archive/2006/06/11/626299.aspx">http://blogs.msdn.com/kaevans/archive/2006/06/11/626299.aspx</a>)</a> . All through it, his reasons given point to calling it something less than .Net 3.0 IMHO. <blockquote class="posterous_short_quote">Again, note that .NET Framework 3.0 is an additive release to .NET Framework 2.0. With .NET Framework 3.0, the languages still use the 2.0 compilers, and leverage the 2.0.50727 Framework.</blockquote>It is based on 2.0 for everything so why not keep with that!!! The version number really doesn't make anything clear!<p /></p>


This content originally appeared on Modern Web Development with Chrome and was authored by Paul Kinlan


Print Share Comment Cite Upload Translate Updates
APA

Paul Kinlan | Sciencx (2006-06-11T00:00:00+00:00) Another reason why .Net 3.0 should be called .Net 2.5 (or something similar). Retrieved from https://www.scien.cx/2006/06/11/another-reason-why-net-3-0-should-be-called-net-2-5-or-something-similar/

MLA
" » Another reason why .Net 3.0 should be called .Net 2.5 (or something similar)." Paul Kinlan | Sciencx - Sunday June 11, 2006, https://www.scien.cx/2006/06/11/another-reason-why-net-3-0-should-be-called-net-2-5-or-something-similar/
HARVARD
Paul Kinlan | Sciencx Sunday June 11, 2006 » Another reason why .Net 3.0 should be called .Net 2.5 (or something similar)., viewed ,<https://www.scien.cx/2006/06/11/another-reason-why-net-3-0-should-be-called-net-2-5-or-something-similar/>
VANCOUVER
Paul Kinlan | Sciencx - » Another reason why .Net 3.0 should be called .Net 2.5 (or something similar). [Internet]. [Accessed ]. Available from: https://www.scien.cx/2006/06/11/another-reason-why-net-3-0-should-be-called-net-2-5-or-something-similar/
CHICAGO
" » Another reason why .Net 3.0 should be called .Net 2.5 (or something similar)." Paul Kinlan | Sciencx - Accessed . https://www.scien.cx/2006/06/11/another-reason-why-net-3-0-should-be-called-net-2-5-or-something-similar/
IEEE
" » Another reason why .Net 3.0 should be called .Net 2.5 (or something similar)." Paul Kinlan | Sciencx [Online]. Available: https://www.scien.cx/2006/06/11/another-reason-why-net-3-0-should-be-called-net-2-5-or-something-similar/. [Accessed: ]
rf:citation
» Another reason why .Net 3.0 should be called .Net 2.5 (or something similar) | Paul Kinlan | Sciencx | https://www.scien.cx/2006/06/11/another-reason-why-net-3-0-should-be-called-net-2-5-or-something-similar/ |

Please log in to upload a file.



There are no updates yet.
Click the Upload button above to add an update.

You must be logged in to translate posts. Please log in or register.

Related Posts