This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Kay Gosho

Recently mixing TypeScript and GraphQL is becoming a web development defacto standard. However, there is not so much information of how to work on them without hassle.

In conclusion, I've found Fragment first approach should painlessly work with TypeScript. Why? it accelerates type definition's reusability. Let's see how it works.

Step 1 - No type

In the example from react-apollo, you can see the following code.

import { useQuery, gql } from "@apollo/client"

const EXCHANGE_RATES = gql`
  query GetExchangeRates {
    rates(currency: "USD") {
      currency
      rate
    }
  }
`

function ExchangeRates() {
  const { loading, error, data } = useQuery(EXCHANGE_RATES)

  if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>
  if (error) return <p>Error :(</p>

  return data.rates.map(({ currency, rate }) => (
    <div key={currency}>
      <p>
        {currency}: {rate}
      </p>
    </div>
  ))
}

It looks nice, but imagine the type of data. Yes, it is any (technically not any but Record, although they are almost same in this context).

Step 2 - Type manually

To avoid data become any, we can type the query result using TypeScript's generics feature.

import { useQuery, gql } from "@apollo/client"

interface GetExchangeRates {
  rates: {
    currency: string
    rate: number
  }[]
}

const EXCHANGE_RATES = gql`
  query GetExchangeRates {
    rates(currency: "USD") {
      currency
      rate
    }
  }
`

function ExchangeRates() {
  const { loading, error, data } = useQuery<GetExchangeRates>(EXCHANGE_RATES)

  if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>
  if (error) return <p>Error :(</p>

  // Type signature of `data` is:
  // {
  //   rates: {
  //     currency: string
  //     rate: number
  //   }[]
  // }

  return data.rates.map(({ currency, rate }) => (
    <div key={currency}>
      <p>
        {currency}: {rate}
      </p>
    </div>
  ))
}

As you can see, this is so painful, because every time we update our query, we should manually update its type too.

Step 3 - Type codegen

Fortunately, we can generate TypeScript's type definitions from GraphQL queries using apollo-tooling.

https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-tooling#apollo-clientcodegen-output

(Note: there are some tools other than apollo, but I prefer apollo because it is the most minimal.)

Let's execute some commands to create type definitions.

npx apollo client:codegen \
  --localSchemaFile schema.gql \
  --target typescript \
  --includes 'src/**/*.{ts,tsx}'

(Note: If you run the above command it will fail, because you won't have schema.gql in local)

Ensure you have schema.gql. Your GraphQL server should have the feature to emit your GraphQL schema to a file.

After the command, you will see a output file including code like this:

// __generated__/GetExchangeRates.ts

export interface GetExchangeRates_rate {
    currency: string
    rate: number
}

export interface GetExchangeRates {
  rates: GetExchangeRates_rate[]
}

So we can replace the last code with the generated types:

import { useQuery, gql } from "@apollo/client"
import { GetExchangeRates } from "./__generated__/GetExchangeRates"

const EXCHANGE_RATES = gql`
  query GetExchangeRates {
    rates(currency: "USD") {
      currency
      rate
    }
  }
`

function ExchangeRates() {
  const { loading, error, data } = useQuery<GetExchangeRates>(EXCHANGE_RATES)

  if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>
  if (error) return <p>Error :(</p>

  return data.rates.map(({ currency, rate }) => (
    <div key={currency}>
      <p>
        {currency}: {rate}
      </p>
    </div>
  ))
}

This is much easier!

The downside is that we should run the command to generate type definitions every time we edit GraphQL code, but it is far easier than manual typing.

I think it is enough for smaller projects. But if the project grows, there will be a problem - type reusability.

Step 4 - Reuse type definitions

Thanks to apollo, we can generate type definitions. However, how to reuse these type definitions?

Imagine we want to seperate our component like this:

// ExchangeRates.tsx

import { useQuery, gql } from "@apollo/client"
import { GetExchangeRates } from "./__generated__/GetExchangeRates"
import { ExchangeRateItem } from "./ExchangeRateItem"

const EXCHANGE_RATES = gql`
  query GetExchangeRates {
    rates(currency: "USD") {
      currency
      rate
    }
  }
`

function ExchangeRates() {
  const { loading, error, data } = useQuery<GetExchangeRates>(EXCHANGE_RATES)

  if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>
  if (error) return <p>Error :(</p>

  return data.rates.map((rate) => (
    <ExchangeRateItem rate={rate} key={rate.currency} />
  ))
}

// ExchangeRateItem.tsx

import { GetExchangeRates_rate } from "./__generated__/GetExchangeRates"

interface ExchangeRateItemProps {
  rate: GetExchangeRates_rate
}

export function ExchangeRateItem({ rate }: ExchangeRateItemProps) {
  const { currency, rate } = rate
  return (
    <div>
      <p>
        {currency}: {rate}
      </p>
    </div>
  )
}

As you can see, we can import common GraphQL type definitions from generated code. However, it should become messy because:

The child component relies on parent's component query.
Hard to re-use ExchangeRateItem because of tied couple of a specific query.
Dependency flow is not linear; ExchangeRateItem -> __generated__ -> ExchangeRates -> ExchangeRateItem

(Note: Technically __generated__ does not depends on ExchangeRates, but conceptually it depends, as type definitions are generated from it)

I haven't fully figured out how to handle this, but using domain seperation and Fragment should be the solution for it.

// graphql/Rate.tsx

import { useQuery, gql } from "@apollo/client"
import {
  GetExchangeRates,
  GetExchangeRates_rate,
} from "./__generated__/GetExchangeRates"

// Re-export fragment type because of reusability
export type { RateFragment } from "./ExchangeRateItem"

const RATE_FRAGMENT = gql`
  fragment RateFragment on Rate {
    currency
    rate
    # ...And other props in the future
  }
`

const EXCHANGE_RATES = gql`
  query GetExchangeRates {
    rates(currency: "USD") {
      ...RateFragment
    }
  }
  ${RATE_FRAGMENT}
`

export const useRates = () => useQuery<GetExchangeRates>(EXCHANGE_RATES)

// Other fragments, hooks, queries will follow

// ExchangeRates.tsx

import { useRates } from "./graphql/Rate

function ExchangeRates() {
  const { loading, error, data } = useRates()

  if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>
  if (error) return <p>Error :(</p>

  return data.rates.map((rate) => (
    <ExchangeRateItem rate={rate} key={rate.currency} />
  ))
}

// ExchangeRateItem.tsx

import { RateFragment } from "./graphql/Rate"

interface ExchangeRateItemProps {
  rate: RateFragment
}

export function ExchangeRateItem({ rate }: ExchangeRateItemProps) {
  const { currency, rate } = rate
  return (
    <div>
      <p>
        {currency}: {rate}
      </p>
    </div>
  )
}

Since we move GraphQL code to ./graphql/Rate, the dependency became linear again;

ExchangeRates -> graphql/Rate -> __generated__
ExchangeRates -> ExchangeRateItem -> graphql/Rate -> __generated__

And the code on component become smaller, which is also great for frontend coders.

Conclusion

Use apollo or other tools to type GraphQL result
Separate GraphQL related code into a directory (if you think your project is large)
Use Fragment to create common reusable type

If you have any thoughts, please post a comment!

This content originally appeared on DEV Community and was authored by Kay Gosho

Print Share Comment Cite Upload Translate Updates

APA

Kay Gosho | Sciencx (2021-04-09T05:55:19+00:00) Step by step guide of how to painlessly type GraphQL execution result. Retrieved from https://www.scien.cx/2021/04/09/step-by-step-guide-of-how-to-painlessly-type-graphql-execution-result/

MLA

" » Step by step guide of how to painlessly type GraphQL execution result." Kay Gosho | Sciencx - Friday April 9, 2021, https://www.scien.cx/2021/04/09/step-by-step-guide-of-how-to-painlessly-type-graphql-execution-result/

HARVARD

Kay Gosho | Sciencx Friday April 9, 2021 » Step by step guide of how to painlessly type GraphQL execution result., viewed ,<https://www.scien.cx/2021/04/09/step-by-step-guide-of-how-to-painlessly-type-graphql-execution-result/>

VANCOUVER

Kay Gosho | Sciencx - » Step by step guide of how to painlessly type GraphQL execution result. [Internet]. [Accessed ]. Available from: https://www.scien.cx/2021/04/09/step-by-step-guide-of-how-to-painlessly-type-graphql-execution-result/

CHICAGO

" » Step by step guide of how to painlessly type GraphQL execution result." Kay Gosho | Sciencx - Accessed . https://www.scien.cx/2021/04/09/step-by-step-guide-of-how-to-painlessly-type-graphql-execution-result/

IEEE

" » Step by step guide of how to painlessly type GraphQL execution result." Kay Gosho | Sciencx [Online]. Available: https://www.scien.cx/2021/04/09/step-by-step-guide-of-how-to-painlessly-type-graphql-execution-result/. [Accessed: ]

rf:citation

» Step by step guide of how to painlessly type GraphQL execution result | Kay Gosho | Sciencx | https://www.scien.cx/2021/04/09/step-by-step-guide-of-how-to-painlessly-type-graphql-execution-result/ |

Please log in to upload a file.

There are no updates yet.
Click the Upload button above to add an update.

You must be logged in to translate posts. Please log in or register.

Step 1 - No type

Step 2 - Type manually

Step 3 - Type codegen

Step 4 - Reuse type definitions

Conclusion

Related Posts