This content originally appeared on Bits and Pieces - Medium and was authored by Hongbo Liu
Exploring the Evolution of Techniques and Technologies for Building Reusable and Scalable Software Components
The concept of component-based development has been a driving force in software engineering for decades. The idea is to build software systems by combining pre-built, reusable components, rather than writing custom code for each application.
This approach offers many benefits, including faster development times, reduced risk of bugs and errors, and improved maintainability and scalability.
However, realizing the full potential of component-based development has proven to be a challenge, and the field has evolved significantly over the years.
In this article, we’ll explore the history of component-based development, the different techniques and technologies that have been developed, the pros and cons of each approach, and the current state of the field.
Component Object Model (COM)
The first widely adopted component-based development technology was the Component Object Model (COM), which was developed by Microsoft in the 1990s. COM enabled developers to build reusable components using a set of standard interfaces, and provided a runtime environment for executing these components. With the advent of the Internet, Microsoft expanded upon this model with the Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM), which added the ability to execute components remotely across a network.
While COM and DCOM were groundbreaking technologies at the time, they were not without their flaws. The component model was complex, and developers often had to write large amounts of code to build even simple components. Additionally, the technology was heavily tied to the Windows operating system, making it difficult to use components developed on other platforms.
COM relies on a unique identifier called the Universal Unique Identifier (UUID) to identify and distinguish components from each other. A UUID is a globally unique identifier that is generated based on specific algorithms and standards.
When a component is created in COM, it is assigned a unique UUID, which serves as its identifier. This UUID is used to identify and locate the component when it is used in another application or system. The UUID is also used to manage versioning of components, as new versions of a component can be assigned a new UUID while still retaining compatibility with older versions.
The use of UUIDs in COM allows components to be easily discovered, identified, and reused in different applications and systems, without requiring any manual configuration. This is one of the key benefits of COM, as it makes it easier to build and deploy large-scale, distributed systems.
Here is an example of C++ code that opens Microsoft Excel using the Component Object Model (COM) to illustrate how COM works:
#include <iostream>
#include <windows.h>
#include <objbase.h>
#include <oleauto.h>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
HRESULT hr;
hr = CoInitialize(NULL);
if (FAILED(hr))
{
cout << "Error initializing COM: " << hex << hr << endl;
return 1;
}
IDispatch *pExcelApp;
hr = CoCreateInstance(CLSID_ExcelApplication, NULL, CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER,
IID_IDispatch, (void**)&pExcelApp);
if (FAILED(hr))
{
cout << "Error creating Excel instance: " << hex << hr << endl;
CoUninitialize();
return 1;
}
DISPID dispid;
OLECHAR *szMember = L"Visible";
hr = pExcelApp->GetIDsOfNames(IID_NULL, &szMember, 1, LOCALE_SYSTEM_DEFAULT, &dispid);
if (FAILED(hr))
{
cout << "Error getting Excel property ID: " << hex << hr << endl;
pExcelApp->Release();
CoUninitialize();
return 1;
}
DISPPARAMS params = {NULL, NULL, 0, 0};
VARIANT varResult;
VariantInit(&varResult);
hr = pExcelApp->Invoke(dispid, IID_NULL, LOCALE_SYSTEM_DEFAULT, DISPATCH_PROPERTYPUT,
¶ms, &varResult, NULL, NULL);
if (FAILED(hr))
{
cout << "Error setting Excel property: " << hex << hr << endl;
pExcelApp->Release();
CoUninitialize();
return 1;
}
cout << "Excel opened successfully" << endl;
pExcelApp->Release();
CoUninitialize();
return 0;
}
In this example, the code starts by initializing the COM library using CoInitialize. Next, it creates an instance of the Microsoft Excel application using CoCreateInstance, and retrieves a IDispatch interface pointer to the Excel application.
Once the IDispatch interface is obtained, the code uses the GetIDsOfNames method to retrieve the dispatch identifier (DISPID) for the Visible property of the Excel application. This allows the code to access and manipulate the Visible property, which is used to control whether the Excel application is visible on the screen.
Finally, the code uses the Invoke method to set the Visible property to TRUE, making the Excel application visible.
This example demonstrates how to use the COM API to create an instance of a COM object, retrieve an interface pointer to the object, and access and manipulate the object’s properties. This is the basic process for using COM to control and interact with a COM object such as Microsoft Excel.
Component Services (COM+)
In the late 1990s, Microsoft introduced Component Services (COM+), which aimed to improve upon the component model of COM and DCOM. COM+ provided a more flexible and scalable environment for building and executing components, and introduced new features such as object pooling and transactions.
However, like its predecessors, COM+ also had its own set of challenges. The technology was still tied to the Windows platform, and developers still had to write significant amounts of code to build and execute components.
Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA)
The advent of the Internet and the rise of Web services marked a turning point in the evolution of component-based development. Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) emerged as a new approach for building applications by combining loosely coupled, reusable components. With SOA, developers could build components using standard Web services protocols, such as Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) and Representational State Transfer (REST), and execute these components across a network.
SOA offered several key benefits over previous component-based development approaches. For example, it enabled developers to build and execute components on any platform, and it provided a more flexible and scalable environment for building applications. However, SOA was not without its own set of challenges. One of the biggest challenges was the complexity of integrating and managing the different components that make up a large-scale SOA-based application.
Common implementation of Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) includes the following:
- Web Services: This is the most widely adopted method for implementing SOA. It uses the standard protocols like HTTP, XML, and SOAP to communicate between services.
Here’s an example of how to consume a SOAP-based web service in C#:
using System;
namespace WebServiceClient
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
MyWebService.ServiceClient client = new MyWebService.ServiceClient();
string data = client.GetData();
Console.WriteLine(data);
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
This is a simple example of how to consume a SOAP-based web service in C#. The specific implementation may vary based on the requirements of the project and the methods exposed by the web service.
- RESTful Web Services: RESTful Web Services use the Representational State Transfer (REST) architecture and can be implemented using HTTP and XML or JSON.
Here’s an example of how to consume a RESTful API in C#:
using System;
using System.Net.Http;
using Newtonsoft.Json;
namespace RestClient
{
class Program
{
static async System.Threading.Tasks.Task Main(string[] args)
{
HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
client.BaseAddress = new Uri("https://api.example.com/");
HttpResponseMessage response = await client.GetAsync("/resource");
if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
{
string responseContent = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
dynamic data = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(responseContent);
Console.WriteLine(data);
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("Request failed with status code: " + response.StatusCode);
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
- Message-Oriented Middleware (MOM): MOM is used to facilitate communication between services by using messaging queues. The services send messages to a queue, and the messages are picked up by other services.
- Enterprise Service Bus (ESB): An ESB is a central component in SOA that provides a communication channel between services. It acts as a broker between services and helps to manage the routing, security, and reliability of messages between services.
- API Management: API Management is used to manage the communication between services, especially in cloud-based environments. API Management platforms help to manage the APIs that are exposed by services, manage access control, and monitor API usage.
These are some of the common implementation methods for SOA, and the choice of implementation method depends on the specific requirements of the project.
Microservices Architecture
More recently, the Microservices Architecture has emerged as the next step in the evolution of component-based development. Microservices provide a way to build scalable and flexible systems by breaking down the components into smaller, independent services that can be developed, deployed, and managed independently.
This approach provides a number of benefits, including improved scalability, faster development and deployment cycles, and greater flexibility. However, it also introduces new challenges, such as increased complexity and difficulty in maintaining a consistent state across the system.
Microservices Architecture works by breaking down a monolithic application into smaller, independently deployable units called microservices. Each microservice is responsible for a specific business capability and communicates with other microservices through APIs.
Here’s an example to illustrate how Microservices Architecture works:
- Consider a monolithic e-commerce application that handles everything from product catalog management to order processing and customer service. In a Microservices Architecture, this application is broken down into several smaller microservices.
- One microservice may handle the product catalog management, another may handle order processing, and yet another may handle customer service.
- The microservices communicate with each other through APIs. For example, when a customer places an order, the order processing microservice communicates with the product catalog management microservice to retrieve the product information and with the customer service microservice to update the customer’s information.
- Each microservice can be developed, deployed, and scaled independently, making it easier to manage the development, deployment, and scaling of the application.
- The API Gateway acts as a reverse proxy and manages the routing, security, and performance of API requests. It ensures that the API requests are properly routed to the correct microservice and provides features like load balancing, traffic management, and service discovery.
- The Service Mesh provides an infrastructure layer for microservices, making communication between microservices more manageable and efficient. It provides features like load balancing, traffic management, and service discovery, among others.
This is a high-level illustration of how Microservices Architecture works, and the specific implementation may vary based on the requirements of the project.
💡 Treating the microservices architecture like composable building blocks is key. This is made easier with an open-source toolchain like Bit which allows your teams to independently publish, version, document, test, and share individual components such as functions, UI elements, or data models, that can be reused across multiple microservices.
This can greatly reduce the duplication of code and increase the modularity and scalability of your system. You can learn more by checking out this guide.
Component-Driven Microservices with NodeJS and Bit
Serverless Architecture
The most recent approach in the evolution of component-based development is Serverless Architecture. Serverless provides a way to build scalable systems without having to worry about the underlying infrastructure.
This approach eliminates the need for infrastructure management and provides a highly scalable platform for building and deploying applications.
However, it also introduces new challenges, such as the need for specialized knowledge and expertise to design and implement serverless systems, as well as the need for robust security and performance monitoring.
Here’s an example to illustrate how Serverless Architecture works:
- Consider an application that requires a function to be executed whenever a user uploads a file to a cloud storage service. In a Serverless Architecture, this function would be implemented as a serverless function.
- The serverless function is triggered by an event, in this case the file upload event. The function executes when the event occurs and returns a result.
- The function runs in an ephemeral container managed by the cloud provider and is automatically scaled in response to incoming requests. The function runs only when triggered and is only charged for the duration of its execution.
- The cloud provider is responsible for managing the underlying infrastructure, including server resources, network configuration, and security. This frees developers from having to manage the infrastructure themselves and allows them to focus on writing code.
- The Serverless Architecture can also include other cloud-based services, such as databases, message queues, and content delivery networks, that can be easily integrated into the application.
This is a high-level illustration of how Serverless Architecture works, and the specific implementation may vary based on the requirements of the project. The key advantage of Serverless Architecture is its ability to scale quickly and cost-effectively, making it an attractive option for many organizations.
The common implementation methods for Serverless Architecture include:
- Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) platforms: These platforms allow developers to write and deploy individual functions or microservices without having to manage any underlying infrastructure. Examples of FaaS platforms include AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, and Azure Functions.
- Event-driven computing: Serverless architectures often rely on event-driven computing, where functions are triggered in response to specific events, such as changes to a database, incoming messages in a queue, or a change in the state of another function.
- Containers: Some serverless implementations make use of containers, allowing for greater control over the environment in which functions run.
- API Management: Serverless architectures typically make use of API gateways to manage incoming requests and handle the routing of requests to the appropriate functions.
- Pay-per-use pricing model: Serverless architectures are often priced based on the number of invocations and the duration of each invocation, providing a cost-effective solution for applications with varying levels of traffic.
These implementation methods allow for the creation of scalable, highly available, and cost-effective applications, where developers only pay for the resources they consume and do not have to worry about managing infrastructure.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the efforts towards component-based development have been ongoing for several decades, and have been driven by the desire to build more flexible, scalable, and efficient systems. Each approach has provided its own benefits and challenges, and has helped to drive the evolution of software engineering towards increasingly flexible and scalable systems.
The current state of component-based development is focused on the Microservices Architecture and Serverless Architecture, which provide a way to build scalable and flexible systems while overcoming many of the challenges that have been encountered in the past.
From monolithic to composable software with Bit
Bit’s open-source tool help 250,000+ devs to build apps with components.
Turn any UI, feature, or page into a reusable component — and share it across your applications. It’s easier to collaborate and build faster.
Split apps into components to make app development easier, and enjoy the best experience for the workflows you want:
→ Micro-Frontends
→ Design System
→ Code-Sharing and reuse
→ Monorepo
Learn more
- How We Build Micro Frontends
- How we Build a Component Design System
- How to reuse React components across your projects
- 5 Ways to Build a React Monorepo
- How to Create a Composable React App with Bit
The Efforts Towards Component-Based Development was originally published in Bits and Pieces on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
This content originally appeared on Bits and Pieces - Medium and was authored by Hongbo Liu
Hongbo Liu | Sciencx (2023-02-22T11:36:09+00:00) The Efforts Towards Component-Based Development. Retrieved from https://www.scien.cx/2023/02/22/the-efforts-towards-component-based-development/
Please log in to upload a file.
There are no updates yet.
Click the Upload button above to add an update.