This content originally appeared on Manuel Matuzović - Blog and was authored by Manuel Matuzović
CSS animations can be composited in three ways: replace
, add
, and accumulate
. The animation-composition
property allows you to switch between them.
div {
animation: changeColor 1s forwards;
animation-composition: add;
}
Let's say you have two color HEX values, #112233
and #224466
. Here's what happens with each composition type when you animate the background color of an element from the first to the second color.
- replace
- The background color changes from the first to the second color. In other words, the second color replaces the first color.
Result:#224466
- add
- The second color is added to the first color, creating a new color.
Result:#336699
- accumulate
- The first and second colors are combined. Often this yields the same result as
add
.
Result:#336699
:root {
--color-a: #112233;
--color-b: #224466;
}
button {
background-color: var(--color-a);
animation: changeColor 2s forwards;
}
@keyframes changeColor {
to {
background-color: var(--color-b);
}
}
button {
/* default */
/* animation-composition: replace; */
}
button.add {
animation-composition: add;
}
butotn.accumulate {
animation-composition: accumulate;
}
Each button starts with #112233
. The first button turns into #224466
, and the second and third buttons turn into #336699
(112233 + 224466).
Colors:
Click one of the following buttons to repeat the animation.
Bramus has a great non-technical explanation for the values. He says that you could compare this with a cup that is filled with tea. When pouring milk in it this would happen:
- replace
- The tea gets removed, and is replaced by the milk.
- add
- The milk gets added to the cup, but it remains layered on top of the tea.
- accumulate
- The milk is added to the tea and, because they are both fluids, they mix nicely.
“replace” is the default you’re familiar with. “add” makes sense, I guess. To understand the difference between “add” and “accumulate”, you have to animate multiple properties. To illustrate that, I’ll steal another great example from my friend Bramus.
In the CSS code, all three animations start with transform: translateX(50px) rotate(45deg)
and end with transform: translateX(100px)
.
.box {
transform: translateX(50px) rotate(45deg);
transform-origin: 50% 50%;
animation: adjust 5s linear infinite alternate;
}
@keyframes adjust {
to {
transform: translateX(100px);
}
}
See the Pen CSS `animation-composition` by web.dev (@web-dot-dev) on CodePen.
Each composition type yields a different result:
- replace
translateX(50px) rotate(45deg)
is replaced bytranslateX(100px)
. The box moves from 50px to 100px and rotates back to 0deg.- add
translateX(50px) rotate(45deg)
turns intotranslateX(50px) rotate(45deg) translateX(100px)
. The box moves 50px, rotates 45deg, and then moves 100px.- accumulate
translateX(50px) rotate(45deg)
turns intotranslateX(150px) rotate(45deg)
. The 100px is added to the 50px, and the box moves from 50px to 150px and rotates 45deg.
You may think that the result of using add and accumulate should be the same because the box is moved by 150px on the x-axis in both cases but the order of transform functions matters. They are applied from left to right. With animation-composition: add
, the box moves 50px, rotates, and then moves another 100px. With animation-composition: accumulate
, it moves 150px and then rotates. If you're curious to learn why exactly the result is different in the end, I suggest you trying reading the transforms spec.
My blog doesn't support comments yet, but you can reply via blog@matuzo.at.
This content originally appeared on Manuel Matuzović - Blog and was authored by Manuel Matuzović
Manuel Matuzović | Sciencx (2024-08-21T00:00:00+00:00) Day 109: the animation-composition property. Retrieved from https://www.scien.cx/2024/08/21/day-109-the-animation-composition-property/
Please log in to upload a file.
There are no updates yet.
Click the Upload button above to add an update.