This content originally appeared on HackerNoon and was authored by Ringi
Table of Links
2. Related Works
2.1. 2D Diffusion Models for 3D Generation
2.2. 3D Generative Models and 2.3. Multi-view Diffusion Models
3. Problem Formulation
3.2. The Distribution of 3D Assets
4. Method and 4.1. Consistent Multi-view Generation
5. Experiments
5.4. Single View Reconstruction
5.5. Novel View Synthesis and 5.6. Discussions
6. Conclusions and Future Works, Acknowledgements and References
5.2. Baselines
We adopt Zero123 [31], RealFusion [38], Magic123 [44], One-2-3-45 [30], Point-E [41], Shap-E [25] and a recent work SyncDreamer [33] as baseline methods. Given an input image, zero123 is capable of generating novel views of arbitrary viewpoints, and it can be incorporated with SDS loss [43] for 3D reconstruction (we adopt the implementation of ThreeStudio [20]). RealFusion [38] and Magic123 [44] leverage Stable Diffusion [47] and SDS loss for single-view reconstruction. One-2-3-45 [30] directly predict SDFs via SparseNeuS [36] by taking the generated multiple images of Zero123 [31]. Point-E [41] and ShapE [25] are 3D generative models trained on a large internal OpenAI 3D dataset, both of which are able to convert a single-view image into a point cloud or an implicit representation. SyncDreamer[33] aims to generate multi-view consistent images from a single image for deriving 3D geometry.
\
\
![Table 1. Quantitative comparison with baseline methods. We report Chamfer Distance and Volume IoU on the GSO [13] dataset.](https://cdn.hackernoon.com/images/fWZa4tUiBGemnqQfBGgCPf9594N2-6k93x6l.png)
\
:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license.
:::
:::info Authors:
(1) Xiaoxiao Long, The University of Hong Kong, VAST, MPI Informatik and Equal Contributions;
(2) Yuan-Chen Guo, Tsinghua University, VAST and Equal Contributions;
(3) Cheng Lin, The University of Hong Kong with Corresponding authors;
(4) Yuan Liu, The University of Hong Kong;
(5) Zhiyang Dou, The University of Hong Kong;
(6) Lingjie Liu, University of Pennsylvania;
(7) Yuexin Ma, Shanghai Tech University;
(8) Song-Hai Zhang, The University of Hong Kong;
(9) Marc Habermann, MPI Informatik;
(10) Christian Theobalt, MPI Informatik;
(11) Wenping Wang, Texas A&M University with Corresponding authors.
:::
\
This content originally appeared on HackerNoon and was authored by Ringi
Ringi | Sciencx (2025-01-02T19:30:15+00:00) The Baseline Methods of Wonder3D and What They Mean. Retrieved from https://www.scien.cx/2025/01/02/the-baseline-methods-of-wonder3d-and-what-they-mean/
Please log in to upload a file.
There are no updates yet.
Click the Upload button above to add an update.